Banner
Advertise with us

Home Op-Ed Modern architecture opposes values of sacred space

Modern architecture opposes values of sacred space

E-mail Print
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Modern architecture opposes values of sacred space

BY C.S. MORRISSEY

Roger Scruton explains how sacred space consecrates the land in order to make a lasting habitation possible, writes C.S. Morrissey. (Photo: The new chapel at Thomas Aquinas College. Photo credit: J.P. Sonnen/OC-Travel.com)Roger Scruton explains how sacred space consecrates the land in order to make a lasting habitation possible, writes C.S. Morrissey. (Photo: The new chapel at Thomas Aquinas College. Photo credit: J.P. Sonnen/OC-Travel.com)

We learn many interesting words when we enter churches, look around, and ask the names of things.

But consider how many of these words are at all familiar to you: “arch, aedicule, engaged column, pilaster, vault and dome.”

How is it not even churchgoers, who in the midst of a secular society still try to cultivate a sense of the sacred, do not even know what a “pilaster” or an “aedicule” is?

The answer lies with modern architecture, which has spread like a cancer even into sacred spaces.

In the secular city, modern architecture imposes its “sheer, stark, uncompromising, cold” features on the buildings that, according to Roger Scruton, look like a “frozen junkyard.”

In Conversations with Roger Scruton, published by Bloomsbury in 2016, Mark Dooley presents a new book-length interview with the famous English philosopher. These fascinating conversations cover much ground, including philosophy, politics, Britain, Europe, sex, farming, wine, tobacco, religion, and music.

Yet Scruton’s willingness to explain further his thoughts on architecture to Dooley makes this an especially important book. Scruton returns to themes he explored earlier in The Aesthetics of Architecture (1979) and The Classical Vernacular (1994).

In Dooley’s book, Scruton tells about a friend of his who pointed out to him how “on Mount Sinai, God gave to Moses not just the Ten Commandments and the law, but also the design for a temple.”

This idea about the supreme importance of sacred space has obviously remained with Scruton over the years. In Scruton’s understanding of architecture, “the building of a temple is the first step” in the entire project of “undertaking the communal task of settling.”

For Scruton, the sacred space must come first, because it is the act whereby “a consecration of the land” is achieved. Without such an act, the “bid for home,” which is involved in any communal effort to settle in a place, is doomed to fail.

Without the sacred space of a temple or church, the city takes on “a kind of godlessness.” We see this in the “facelessness” of the modern city’s skyscrapers, whose “glazed facades mirror each other’s emptiness.”

Scruton speaks of how, in most cities, modernist buildings cause the streets to “die in their shadow.” But this barren urban environment has arisen only because modern architecture has intentionally discarded the requirements of sacred space. Instead, it has instituted a rival cult of desecration.

In his dialogue with Dooley, Scruton makes the devastating observation that “if you can’t build a temple and get it right, all other building is merely provisional and utilitarian. It becomes a matter of putting up sheds.”           

In other words, “Real architecture is precisely getting beyond the shed to the settlement, in which the earth is transformed from a mere habitat to a lasting habitation.”

Of course, many examples of real architecture may still be found in the world. Scruton points to the example of Venice, which he thinks is a particularly wonderful accomplishment. Alluding to Botticelli’s famous painting (which he fondly used to illustrate beauty in his BBC documentary, “Why Beauty Matters”), Scruton calls Venice “a lasting work of the religious imagination, a vision of eternity rising like Venus from the sea.”

St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice obviously performs Scruton’s “first step” of architecture, by consecrating the land, making a lasting habitation possible. It does so because, as with the civic benefit conferred by all sacred space, it is “the thing that reminds you that you are together and under a shared obedience.”

In his conversations with Dooley, Scruton explains why cities need to have centres. He makes clear his distaste for those big box stores on the edges of towns. “You must tell the supermarkets that they must build in the centre or be part of a shared attempt to create a new centre. That is to say, they must build in the style accepted in the centre, which means behind a proper façade and on a street. That means they can’t get very big,” he insists.

While some might find this an outrageous constraint on economic activity, Scruton presents a compelling argument why the benefits of such a policy would outweigh any costs involved. For the common good, “we all have to obey laws that have an economic cost to obeying them.”

Therefore he thinks it is not too much to ask retailers to submit to a vision that serves the community rather than simply enriches their shareholders. Otherwise, we will be saddled with the ongoing ugliness inflicted on our environment by corporations. Their desire for unlimited growth, for example, creates hideously gigantic parking lots for the customers they need to fund unlimited growth.

Scruton’s ideal is more appealing. Rather than making us drive to shops, architecture must answer to human nature’s real need for walking. We should always be able to “walk from the home to the centre” of any town, he says. Rather than mega-cities, we need many towns, each with a human-scale commercial centre.

As for those big box stores, Scruton insists we must “forbid people to build on the edge of towns.” Without such zoning laws, a large cost is offloaded onto the environment and also onto the humans who drive instead of walking everywhere. While the companies pursue unlimited profit growth, our bodies and buildings become obese.

Yet none of this is sustainable. Maybe we should try out the divine plan given to Moses instead.

Dr. C.S. Morrissey cultivates classical tradition by teaching the Greek and Latin classics. Learn more at moreC.com.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 07:48  

Dear reader,

Due to an unmanageable amount of spam and abusive messages, we are no longer able to offer the comment function on our website. We respect the principle of public debate and remain committed to it. Please send us a note at letters@rcav.org and visit us in the near future when we have finished building our new website — at which point the comment function will be restored.


Kind regards,

The B.C. Catholic

 
Banner

 

Banner

 

Multimedia

Salt and Light Webcast
  
  Courtesy of Salt & Light Television



Click image to watch Video
Medieval Gem - UBC acquires papal bull

Click image to watch Video
Paul Goo's Diaconate Ordination

Click image to watch Video
Thank You John Paul II

 

 

 
4885 Saint John Paul II Way Vancouver BC V5Z 0G3   Phone: 604 683 0281 Fax: 604 683 8117
© The B.C. Catholic

Informing Catholics in Canada since 1931